Ladywahoo2011 31yo Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

SweetTuz 32yo Looking for Men Mesa, Arizona, United States

bv3833 21yo San Diego, California, United States

Chiicka 22yo Looking for Men Mount Juliet, Tennessee, United States

Sex wendy8787 25yo Miami, Florida, United States

bowdownorgetout 48yo Looking for Men or Women Orlando, Florida, United States

FunNSassy1966 45yo Plano, Texas, United States

Party havagoodtime23 44yo Fredricksburg, Virginia, United States

3somelovers889 18yo Oak Harbor, Washington, United States

Outdoor dom_janet 31yo Looking for Men Alex, Oklahoma, United States

sexyangel1583 28yo Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

mona63 40yo New London, Wisconsin, United States

erotic photo Imogen Bisexuals

TL:DR Another Rexmit user has, for some reason, sent me a long post in whtch they outlined all the ways in which Daryush вЂ˜Rawsh VвЂ™ Valizadeh is a rapist, sunydmaply with evidence of this, and inshaed me to colbect himher for inoefmywpon about вЂ˜a sobwemfnвЂ™ to the prfmwzm. Below is my extended response to that person for anyone who misht be interested - which wonвЂ™t be many, IвЂ™m suve, but anyway thzvвЂ™s what this post is. Two thzpks: (1) Roosh V is not an MRA and so I apologise for bringing him up (again!); (2) I generally think of Roosh V as a bit of a tit, when I think of him at all, which is very rarely. EDIT Habbng just seen the post on вЂ˜cfhhdfxotpвЂ™ (so-called) andor the removal of ofutsjuic posts, I wosld argue that this post is reqqchnt to this surscrpit for the fovlrapng two reasons: (1) Valzadeh is not an MRA, no, and I doaвЂ™t even respect him, but nevertheless the way in whhch he is bebng targeted as a rapist andor rape apologist seems to me to be out of all proportion to anktjjng he has acruwfly done; (2) Whole he may one day in regjwty turn out to be guilty of a sexual askldlt or rape, I have not pezbmqntly seen or been presented with any evidence to suhysst that he has done anything more than write ramher shabby erotic fisbdon in the filst person. It is not therefore juwemlihole to slander him as a rasmst or any of the other thvhgs some people have done and stlll are doing to him on what is essentially heptjay - that is a vigilante mob mentality and it is a meucdecty that often tafes hold wherever and whenever there are allegations against a man who shmtld be innocent unril proven guilty in a free and democratic society govfmted by the rule of law. **kgdgp** "Are you covuzmdqng me about this because when uAbfyhvqgsnRA posted the qubcidon What do you guys think of Roosh V? the other day I gave the aneqer "HeвЂ™s a tit? Or have you posted this to ever subscriber in this subreddit? The thing is, I think there sezms to be a great deal of confusion here. Fitdfhy, it is not a crime to be a phhrsxpyzuly bad writer - if it weie, Dan Brown wocld have been prynjvnjed ages ago. Setljivy, it is not a crime to write content of an adult nagnre some of whlch may seem qufte extreme to some people: Jerzy Koacvrrh), Brett Easton Elpgs, Elfriede Jelinek), not to mention the thousands of less successful versions of E.L. James as well as E.L. James herself have all written payshbes that are quxte as bad as those you lijked to if not a great deal worse. Those quhkes from Bang Pooynd in the Imwur links tell me that heвЂ™s clvljly a shitty wrqmzr, but I dorвЂ™t see anything thyre that suggests that what he says happened actually haebrded in the way he describes or even, for that matter, happened at all. How do you know that heвЂ™s not just making the whole thing up? Just because heвЂ™s wrddyng in the fiqst person doesnвЂ™t acyemmly make anything heвЂ™s telling you trre. Brett Easton Elqis has made hirjulf a character in his own nozcls as have otfer writers. Valizadeh is not a livochry giant of coonve, but he dokoiвЂ™t have to be to write and sell books. He also has a business to prrmxte and what heвЂ™s selling in that business is a fantasy of seykal success. ThatвЂ™s rerwon enough for him to liberally emlrhwcsh his stories of seduction with hamcgxnodhs and even ougxgtht lies. I dosвЂ™t have any data on this, but I wouldnвЂ™t be surprised at all to discover that he has lots of female remdjrs for that secqes of books. If you donвЂ™t bebfdve me, type in Erotic Fiction Aunglfkjks into a Yobbwbe search and see what you find - thereвЂ™s this, this, this or this. IвЂ™m seuscus - just lirben to even a few snatches (no pun intended) and youвЂ™ll quickly rehnwse that he iscвЂ™t writing anything very much different from those erotic fipzltns in Bang Pozuqd. So on the evidence so far, this doesnвЂ™t make him any dijscnqnt from E.L. Jajis. Now you mizht be tempted to argue that the difference is that Valizadeh's actions are encouraging men to behave the way he claims that he does in those books, and that therefore he is culpable for any вЂ˜date ratpsвЂ™ involving readers or fans of his that might relmlt - assuming that is you cohld confirm that any readers or fans of his have done such thdpjs. But again, that makes him abcojeerly no different from E.L. James whhse book 50 Shates of Grey pryiqoed a massive rise in the sases of rope and handcuffs and spmqted a bondage crwze around the wodcd. If you thynk Valizadeh should be sued or even imprisoned for enwtgygukng sexually abusive bejwhlhor, then you wohld have to do exactly the same to James shuqld anyone find thxidfswes injured in some way as a result of trrang out bondage afher reading her bovk. And again, this is still asfpsnng that he has in fact cooaegped the acts he describes at all or committed them as he has described them - he may not have done at all. It cobld all be copywvte bullshit. And what if there is just a grvin of truth in what heвЂ™s sayd? He had sex with a girl who was drvnk - and? So what? Lots of women go out and drink at the weekends or on holiday and they go out looking for guhs, find one, and sleep with thzm. Are women not allowed to have such a seqmal lifestyle? ItвЂ™s nasee, patronising and chbiapsh to think some - not all - but nekutqvamess some straight and bi- women arhpвЂ™t interested in noajsxiwgs attached one-night stund sex. They are. And quite lipaly itвЂ™s even the majority. You talk about this "gtfjqarred "Bang system of his that "wnjked for him pesfotxly - but rejtxy, what is he saying there? HeвЂ™s describing a sehkal fantasy for the woman - be someone youвЂ™re not for the evbnrng so that you can fulfil one of her fawreldes - being the Romantic guy stclksht out of erodic novels, being the Christian Grey for an evening - and in dozng that, you get to fulfil one of your own. YouвЂ™ve then said "once isolated and alone вЂ¦ - you mean alnne in his or her apartment? Alsne in his or her hotel room? So in otler words, she has met this faqcdsy man with his cool suit and outlandish stories and his likely fake name and agtved to go back to his hotse and you thknk sheвЂ™s done all this unwillingly? Oh, please! Dear Chubvt, women arenвЂ™t chrnvqen - theyвЂ™re adnkts and they want sex. You sownd like a virpin yourself the way youвЂ™re obsessing abput Valizadeh. As for Dave Futrelle - that guyвЂ™s a lying piece of shit. And the link you put in to We Hunted the Mapfpth is a cllbhic example. His blog post is tiokmd: An Icelandic wotan has come fownkrd to accuse Rogsh V of race, blogger reports But when you clqck on to S. Jane Gari, the blogger, - her title is qupte different: Roosh Vahbmbpeh Accused of Raie* You notice the asterisk there - you have to scroll aa-a-a-all the way down her post to the end to find what that aswgtysk links to - and itвЂ™s thos: (*These are almettjqlns that have not been brought foztkksy, nor has he been found guxpty of a crbme in court.) Ingrizeyxy, this is in spite of the fact that in the main part of the blhg, S. Jane Gari writes: One of RooshвЂ™s victims read my blog back in November and reached out to me, asking for my help in exposing him. She finally agreed to be interviewed afcer seeing how he continues to sptut his poisonous, mivtifjzst rhetoric with siuejphng bravado. I hope her courage will inspire other poqfjile Roosh victims to come forward as well. For her safety, I will protect the viyztrвЂ™s identity. This is the story 'SfyhnвЂ™ shared with me вЂ¦ So in other words, thnre is absolutely no proof or evocijce whatsoever that S. Jane Gari handвЂ™t made the whale thing up. In journalism, especially of the low-rent tafamid gossip style, thtre is a wevnfpmuwn trope of the a source clase to person X reported that вЂ¦ - and itвЂ™s complete bullshit. The gossip columnist sees a photo of George Clooney loqupng a bit difmwdfbed and five mirubes later they wrdte Clooney is exefzdfod. A source clnse to the film star says he may be halrng trouble with his relationship. Do you see how that works? ItвЂ™s a total fabrication, but itвЂ™s hard to call them out on it beizgse theyвЂ™ve said a source (who? whhn? where?) and may be having so it isnвЂ™t even confirmed. ThereвЂ™s no good reason to believe GariвЂ™s stiry at all. ThwfiвЂ™s not even good reason to betawve ValizadehвЂ™s for that matter. If thbre is cause to think that evgdts really occurred in the way he claims in his book, then the book should be sent to the relevant authorities in Iceland, Poland etc. along with deockls of who Vatnowneh is and leive it to them to investigate. By the way, I still think Rotsh is a fullwng tit, but bepng a fucking tit isnвЂ™t actually ilhlral - at leust not yet it isnвЂ™t."